Patient safety
Results are back, without results: why the app never shows them
Most patients say they want their results immediately. The same research shows that abnormal results nearly triple the odds of worry, and that waiting for results drives people to refresh again and again. In the emergency department there is a better answer: show the progress, not the result.
- By
- EDFlow team
- Published
- Reading time
- 3 min read
Wanting results and coping with them are different things
In a survey of 8,139 patient portal users, 95.7% preferred to receive their results immediately, even before a clinician had reviewed them. Yet 16.5% of people with abnormal results reported more worry, compared with 5.0% of people with normal results (odds ratio 2.71).[1] A later study found that patients repeatedly refreshed the portal while waiting for 25.9% of results, and for 39.3% of high-sensitivity results, and that refreshing predicted messages to clinicians.[2]
Preferences also depend on what is at stake. Most patients accept online release of low-stakes results, but a majority prefer to hear serious results, such as a cancer diagnosis, in person.[3]
Why the emergency department is different
An emergency visit is different from a portal at home. Results arrive within hours, often while the patient is alone on a stretcher, and many are preliminary or part of a picture that only makes sense together. The clinician is minutes away and will explain them, in context, as part of a plan.
The closest published analogue to a test tracker, a digital care updates pilot, showed progress bars for lab, imaging, consults and disposition with no results and no health information, and deliberately waited 30 minutes before showing "complete" so clinicians could talk first. Satisfaction with lab turnaround was 86% with updates versus 55% without in the unmatched analysis.[4]
Show the process, not the value
| Lab tests | Imaging | Heart tests |
|---|---|---|
| Ordered | Ordered | Ordered |
| Collected | Scan | Done |
| In the lab | Being read | |
| Back | Back |
"Back" uses a neutral information tone and a tray icon, never a green check or a celebration, because a result being back is not good news or bad news: it is a result. When the last one arrives, the screen says so in the same neutral tone and the timeline moves to the next step: seeing the care team again, with a usual time for this hour.
The rules behind the screen
- No values, flags or interpretation anywhere: not on screen, not in notifications, and not in the words "normal", "fine" or "stable".
- Sensitive tests appear as "Additional test".
- Held results stay at "In the lab" or "Being read" until the clinician releases them.
- Notifications only at meaningful moments (first result in, all results in, next step) and always generic on the lock screen.
Not showing results also keeps EDFlow clearly on the right side of Health Canada's line between communication software and a medical device, and lets it coexist with the hospital's patient portal, which releases results under the hospital's own rules.[5]
Frequently asked questions
What does the patient see about a test?
It shows each test as a process: ordered, collected, in the lab, back. "Back" means a result exists. The care team explains what it means, in person.
Can the "all back" moment be delayed?
Some hospitals choose to give clinicians a few minutes to review results before patients see that everything is back. A site setting can delay the "all back" moment by up to 30 minutes.
Sources
- [1]Perspectives of Patients About Immediate Access to Test Results Through an Online Patient Portal (opens in a new tab) · JAMA Network Open, 2023
- [2]Repeated Access to Patient Portal While Awaiting Test Results and Patient-Initiated Messaging (opens in a new tab) · JAMA Network Open, 2025
- [3]Informed or anxious: patient preferences for release of test results of increasing sensitivity on electronic patient portals (opens in a new tab) · PubMed Central, 2022
- [4]Digital Care Updates in the Emergency Department: A Feasibility Study (opens in a new tab) · Academic Emergency Medicine, 2019
- [5]Guidance Document: Software as a Medical Device (SaMD): Definition and Classification (opens in a new tab) · Health Canada